Dickson v. Hubbell Realty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In interpreting a contract, we give effect to language of the entire contract in accordance with its commonly accepted and ordinary meaning.”
• “In interpreting a contract, we give effect to language of the entire contract in accordance with its commonly accepted and ordinary meaning.”
• “[I]t is assumed that no part of [a contract] is superfluous and an interpretation that gives a reasonable meaning to all terms is preferred to one that leaves a term superfluous or of no effect.”
• “[b]ecause we give effect to the language of the entire contract, it is assumed that no part of it is superfluous and an interpretation that gives a reasonable meaning to all terms is preferred to one that leaves a term superfluous or of no effect.”
• “Because we give effect to the language of the entire contract, it is assumed that no part of it is superfluous and an interpretation that gives a reasonable meaning to all terms is preferred to one that leaves a term superfluous or of no effect.”
• “Because we give effect to the language of the entire contract, it is assumed that no part of it is superfluous and an interpretation that gives a reasonable meaning to all terms is preferred to one that leaves a term superfluous or of no effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).