· 2/9/2001
Dicks v. Jensen
Citations
- 768 A.2d 1279
- 172 Vt. 43
- 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2007
- 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1299
- 2001 Vt. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Trade Secrets Act bars common law remedies for use of competitor’s customer list to solicit customers
- stating that when statute is intended to “make uniform the law among states enacting it” we will “draw from the decisions of our sister states” (quotation omitted)
- stating that when statute is intended to “make uniform the law . . . among states enacting it” we will “draw from the decisions of our sister states” (quotation omitted)
- affirming summary judgment on alternate grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.