Skip to main content
· 6/15/2015

Dicks v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 109 F. Supp. 3d 126
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77182
  • 2015 WL 3701512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiffs were substantially justified 6 in rejecting a settlement offer that included only $400 in attorneys’ fees where counsel had expended 33.5 hours on the case as of the date of the offer
  • refusing to reimburse for work “drafting and filing a separate complaint and corresponding with DCPS about the resolution of this separate action”
  • refusing to reimburse for work \drafting and filing a separate complaint and corresponding with DCPS about the resolution of this separate action\
  • “A settlement offer that compensates counsel for a mere fraction [of] its efforts deters parents from exercising their due process rights and, as such, is inimical to the IDEA’s purpose.”
  • “A settlement offer that compensates 25 counsel for a mere fraction for its efforts deters parents from exercising their due process rights 26 and, as such, is inimical to the IDEA’s purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Richard J. Leon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.