· 6/15/2015
Dicks v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 109 F. Supp. 3d 126
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77182
- 2015 WL 3701512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiffs were substantially justified 6 in rejecting a settlement offer that included only $400 in attorneys’ fees where counsel had expended 33.5 hours on the case as of the date of the offer
- refusing to reimburse for work “drafting and filing a separate complaint and corresponding with DCPS about the resolution of this separate action”
- refusing to reimburse for work \drafting and filing a separate complaint and corresponding with DCPS about the resolution of this separate action\
- “A settlement offer that compensates counsel for a mere fraction [of] its efforts deters parents from exercising their due process rights and, as such, is inimical to the IDEA’s purpose.”
- “A settlement offer that compensates 25 counsel for a mere fraction for its efforts deters parents from exercising their due process rights 26 and, as such, is inimical to the IDEA’s purpose.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Richard J. Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.