Dickinson v. Winchester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing the amount of attorney fees to the amount of claim in case
• defendant’s act of publishing such an opin- ion online qualified as “conduct in furtherance of * * * the constitutional right of free speech” for purposes of ORS 31.150(2)(d), because the right to post an “opinion of that nature” is part of the “First Amendment right to free speech”
• defendant’s act of publishing such an opinion online qualified as “conduct in furtherance of * * * the consti- tutional right of free speech” for purposes of ORS 31.150(2)(d), because the right to post an “opinion of that nature” is part of the “First Amendment right to free speech”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).