Dickinson v. Security Bank of Richmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that where the subject matter of the contract is mobile — and not a stationary object such as land or a building — “the location of the subject matter of the contract has been determined to be the location of the subject matter on the day of delivery”
• “Thirty-one states. . . do not require privity of contract to recover for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability where only economic damages are involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).