Dickhaut v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury reasonably could have deduced appellant was selling marijuana based on record evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 134×
• Hooper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-02-18· cited 40×
• Herrin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-07-09· cited 28×
• Sutton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-02-19· cited 24×
• Elizondo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-14· cited 8×
• Garcia v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-20· cited 4×