Skip to main content
· 6/5/1987

Dickerson v. Curtis

Citations

  • 661 F. Supp. 1084
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The CBT Act and the GIT Act are separate and distinct. They are not in pari materia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.