· 2/12/1986
Dickerson v. Attorney General
Citations
- 488 N.E.2d 757
- 396 Mass. 740
- 1986 Mass. LEXIS 1184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- for purpose of equal protection analysis, standard of review under State and Federal Constitutions is identical
- “The due process clause does not require a State to afford any appellate process whatsoever”
- standard of review for purposes of equal protection under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights is the same as under the Fourteenth Amendment
- defendants convicted of murder in first degree are referred to as “capital” defendants, although capital punishment is not currently recognized in Commonwealth
- “For the purpose of equal protection analysis, our standard of review under ... the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights is the same as under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution”
- “The due process clause does not require a State to afford any appellate process whatsoever”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Nolan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.