Dickerson Carolina, Inc. v. Harrelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that normal attorney-client relationship does not bar Rule 60(b) relief when “the evidence is clear that the attorney and his client were not acting as one”
• holding that normal attorney-client relationship does not bar Rule 60(b) relief when \the evidence is clear that the attorney and his client were not acting as one\
• granting relief in part because counsel \actively misled and lulled his client into believing this case was proceeding smoothly\
• distinguishing Link as a case concerning trial court’s discretion to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute rather than its power to vacate a default judgment
• distinguishing Link as a case concerning trial court's discretion to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute rather than its power to vacate a default judgment
• “The usual understanding of the attorney-client agency relationship, however, should not bar relief under Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).