Dickenson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is misconduct for a juror to make false statements in response to questions on voir dire examination, and such is held to constitute reversible error because it impairs the right to challenge the juror, either peremptorily or for cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Randolph v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-10· cited 41×
• Caron v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-31· cited 15×
• Lloyd J. Diehl v. Larry J. Clemons
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-06-25· cited 7×
• Kastin E. Slaybaugh v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-09-24· cited 5×
• James Beasley v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-29· cited 3×
• Leandrew Beasley v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-29· cited 2×
• Joseph Waldron v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29
• Ray Chamorro v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lopez v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-09-06· cited 145×
• Taylor v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 101×
• Lahrman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-07-17· cited 23×
• Berkman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-01-23· cited 11×
• McCurry v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-11-09· cited 9×
• Fuquay v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-18· cited 7×