Dickenson v. Jackson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1236
Syllabus
The domestic relations court did not err by finding appellant in contempt under R.C. 2705.02(A) for violating her and appellee's shared parenting plan in regard to appellee's parenting time schedule nor did the domestic relations court err by ordering appellant to pay attorney fees and litigation expenses to appellee in accordance with R.C. 3105.73(B) based upon appellant being found in contempt.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disapproves motion testing “the competency of the evidence presented to the grand jury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.