· 4/15/1994
Dickens v. Snodgrass, Dunlap & Co.
Citations
- 872 P.2d 252
- 255 Kan. 164
- 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1055
- 1994 Kan. LEXIS 56
- 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting elements of tort as set forth in 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Interference § 39, p. 314
- finding no implied contract for continuing employment despite increases in pay and responsibilities and absence of negative evaluations
- In common usage, the word “willful” is considered synonymous with such words as “voluntary,” “deliberate,” and “intentional.”
- “The mere fact that an employee has not been previously terminated under written contractual employment-at-will provisions does not create an implied contract for continuing employment.”
- “The elements essential to recovery for tortious interference with contract are: (1) the' contract____”
- “An ‘at-will’ employee has no property interest in employment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.