Skip to main content
· 4/15/1994

Dickens v. Snodgrass, Dunlap & Co.

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 252
  • 255 Kan. 164
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1055
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 56
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting elements of tort as set forth in 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Interference § 39, p. 314
  • finding no implied contract for continuing employment despite increases in pay and responsibilities and absence of negative evaluations
  • In common usage, the word “willful” is considered synonymous with such words as “voluntary,” “deliberate,” and “intentional.”
  • “The mere fact that an employee has not been previously terminated under written contractual employment-at-will provisions does not create an implied contract for continuing employment.”
  • “The elements essential to recovery for tortious interference with contract are: (1) the' contract____”
  • “An ‘at-will’ employee has no property interest in employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.