· 4/26/1991
Dickens v. Ming Lee
Citations
- 230 Cal. App. 3d 985
- 281 Cal. Rptr. 783
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4038
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 6762
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- notice of appeal filed over sixty days after entry of initial judgment was found to be timely as amended judgment substantially modified the initial judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.