Skip to main content
· 7/5/1802

Dickens v. . Ashe

Citations

  • 3 N.C. 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that handwritten document entitled “Last Will and Testament” was not written with testamentary intent
  • holding that the informality of the instrument at issue, “when considered in the light of the business training, the habits and the accommodations of the deceased,” supported the conclusion that the script was not intended to be effective as a will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.