Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/3/1936
Dick v. Dick
Citations
- 144 Kan. 183
- 58 P.2d 1125
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- held it was not error for trial court to overrule motion for new trial, there was testimony in motion hearing that the juror was not asleep but simply relaxing and closing his eyes while listening to testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harvey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.