Michigan Court of Appeals· 12/3/1985
Dick v. Dick
Citations
- 383 N.W.2d 240
- 147 Mich. App. 513
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the importance of having a day-to-day relationship with a parent
- requiring application of the D’Onofrio factors to a custodial parent’s petition to remove children from the state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walsh, Gribbs, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. LovemanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-05-14· cited 96×
- Rittershaus v. RittershausMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 82×
- Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-22· cited 53×
- Grew v. KnoxMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-02-24· cited 25×
- Anderson v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-07-20· cited 21×
- Dehring v. DehringMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 11×
- Grew v. KnoxMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-04-15· cited 4×
- Stephani Lara Yachcik v. Kristopher Jon YachcikMichigan Court of Appeals· 2017-02-28
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-09-01· cited 180×
- Hutchins v. HutchinsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-06-19· cited 21×
- Henry v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-09-07· cited 18×
- Bielawski v. BielawskiMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-09-17· cited 15×
- Watters v. WattersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-12-16· cited 15×
- Scott v. ScottMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-03-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.