DiCiantis v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 a plaintiff must have, inter alia, a protected liberty or property interest
• finding that, under , there is no constitutional liberty interest in prison disciplinary proceedings absent an “atypical and significant hardship . . . imposed on the prisoner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).