DiCentes v. Michaud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that close temporal proximity between protected activity and adverse employment action does not end the matter
• failure to recommend an employee for future employment was insufficient to constitute a WPA violation
• “Proof of conduct protected by the WPA ... followed in close proximity by an adverse employment action, gives rise to an inference that a causal connection is established _”
• high school teacher’s contract was not renewed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).