DiCello v. United States (In Re the Railway Reorganization Estate, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the section 546(a) limitations period is “strictly construed as applicable only to the actions named,” and that “[c]ourts will not look to the underlying nature of the proceeding” to determine whether this code provision applies
• “Clauses [that] purport to terminate, limit or otherwise modify a debtor’s interest in its property upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition are unenforceable under the Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).