Skip to main content
· 12/2/1994

Dibrell Brothers International S.A., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

Citations

  • 38 F.3d 1571
  • 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 196
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33697
  • 1994 WL 642780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating fraud and civil RICO claims separately and mentioning lack of duty in breach of contract analysis
  • stating “because of a lack of privity between the confirming bank and the customer, the confirming bank has no right of reimbursement against the original customer and owes that customer no duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Johnson, Paine, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.