Dible v. Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts can consider “papers filed in opposition to the [anti-SLAPP]. motion to the extent that they might give meaning to the words in the complaint”
• “If the actionable communication fits within the 13 definition contained in the statute, the motive of the communicator does not matter.” 14 (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).