Dibello v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying section 555a to action brought by cable operator challenging city’s requirement that it obtain a permit before providing cable services
• noting that “damages are precluded if section 555a(a) applies”
• “[T]he mere pendency of these large damage claims has had significant adverse effects on the functioning of local governments. These claims represent a potentially crippling burden on local government treasuries . . . .” (alterations in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).