Dibble v. Washington Food Co.
Citations
- 57 Wash. 176
- 106 P. 760
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 722
Syllabus
<p>Receivers — Sales — Vacation — Limitations —- Laches. A sale made by a receiver to his business associate, confirmed by the court, will not be vacated for fraud and inadequacy of price, where it appears from the petition that the applicants knew of the business relationship of the purchaser and the inadequacy of price at the time of the sale and confirmation, and did not file their petition within one year as required by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 466, but waited several years until sued for unpaid stock subscriptions.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Traditionally, this Court, in assessing whether speech by a member of the judiciary is protected political speech, has applied the two-prong test promulgated in Pickering[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.