DiBartolomeo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing where trial court compelled defendant to proceed pro se without making an adequate inquiry into his financial status because “[t]he trial court had a duty to make a full inquiry into the defendant’s financial circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-12-02· cited 36×
• Cooper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-05· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-10· cited 4×
• People v. Alengi
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-06-27· cited 4×
• People v. Arguello
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1987-06-29· cited 3×
• J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-09· cited 1×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-09· cited 1×
• Ramon A. Osorio v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Enrique v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-22· cited 26×
• Keene v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-21· cited 22×
• Drago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-25· cited 10×

Other cases named DiBartolomeo v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• DiBartolomeo v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 9×
• Dibartolomeo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-01-21