Díaz v. Suc. de Cintrón Berríos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the principles enun- ciated by the Supreme Court in Miranda v Arizona apply to military interrogations of criminal suspects.” (citation omitted)
• holding that military courts, like state courts, have the same responsibility as federal courts to protect a person from a violation of constitutional rights; and holding specifically that the principles enunciated in Miranda are applicable in military pros- ecutions
• explaining that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda applies to the military justice system
• “It ignores the realities of [military life] to say that one ordered to appear for interrogation has not been significantly deprived of his freedom of action.”
• \It ignores the realities of [military life] to say that one ordered to appear for interrogation has not been significantly deprived of his freedom of action.\
• Because Miranda is applicable to military interrogations, servicemem-bers have the right to request appointment and presence of an attorney at custodial interrogations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).