Nevada Supreme Court· 7/18/2002
Diaz v. State
Citations
- 118 Nev. 451
- 50 P.3d 166
- 118 Nev. Adv. Rep. 48
- 2002 Nev. LEXIS 62
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a defendant’s motion to dismiss tolls the IAD’s time periods
- stating that this court need not consider new issues on appeal
- stating that this court need not consider new issues on appeal
- stating that this court need not consider new issues on appeal
- stating that this court need not consider new issues on appeal
- \The TAD is designed to systemize the disposition of untried indictments.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker, Rose, Shearing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 241×
- United States v. Thomas NesbittSeventh Circuit· 1988-09-09· cited 149×
- United States v. HinesFourth Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 87×
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasFifth Circuit· 1993-02-24· cited 86×
- Bernard Stroble v. Charles Anderson, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, RespondentSixth Circuit· 1978-11-01· cited 69×
- United States v. Joel Robert ScheerSecond Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 58×
- United States v. Larry JohnsonNinth Circuit· 1992-01-13· cited 57×
- United States v. Norman Gaylord ReedNinth Circuit· 1980-06-27· cited 50×
- United States v. Charles Dawn, Also Known as Charles Cole, Also Known as Charles WebbSeventh Circuit· 1990-06-25· cited 38×
- State v. McGannSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-28· cited 19×
- Walch v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-01-04· cited 18×
- State v. BurrusCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-13· cited 17×
- United States v. Wayde Lynn KurtNinth Circuit· 1991-09-16· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. PetrozzielloMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-04-15· cited 16×
- Snyder v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 13×
- State v. BatungbacalHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 9×
- Shanks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1978-12-01· cited 8×
- State v. BernsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-06· cited 7×
- Theis v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.