Court of Appeals of Texas· 8/3/2000
Diaz v. State
Citations
- 68 S.W.3d 680
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 5183
- 2000 WL 1060536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in the absence of an express limitation, a reviewing court must identify a clearly implied limitation
- in the absence of an express limitation, a reviewing court must identify a clearly implied limitation
- wife’s failure to file Exhibit B precludes review of her claim that trial court erred in failing to award maintenance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barajas, Chew, McClure
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2010-10-22· cited 126×
- Crawford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-02-26· cited 34×
- Christian Health Care of Springfield West Park, Inc. v. LittleMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-08-27· cited 26×
- Enrique Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2016-11-16· cited 9×
- Wood v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-29· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseTexas Supreme Court· 2010-10-22
- Joseph Kalka v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-10-20
- David Crawford, Potter County Constable, Precinct 3 v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-02-26
- Opinion No.Texas Attorney General Reports· 2008-07-09
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 2008-07-02
- City of Tyler v. Liberty Utilities (Tall Timbers Sewer) Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-12-20
- in Re the Texas Department of Family and Protective ServicesTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2022-06-01
- in Re the Texas Department of Family and Protective ServicesTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2022-09-14
- In Re the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2023-10-11
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0501Texas Attorney General Reports· 2025-10-30
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1996-08-16· cited 728×
- Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court· 1968-04-03· cited 317×
- Union Bankers Insurance Co. v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court· 1994-11-22· cited 302×
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 238×
- Weiner v. WassonTexas Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 228×
- Robinson v. HillTexas Supreme Court· 1974-03-13· cited 169×
- Miller v. County of El PasoTexas Supreme Court· 1941-04-23· cited 132×
- Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 102×
- Texas Water Commission v. Brushy Creek Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1996-02-09· cited 96×
- Maple Run at Austin Municipal Utility District v. MonaghanTexas Supreme Court· 1996-10-18· cited 66×
- Government Services Insurance Underwriters v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1963-05-22· cited 63×
- Luehrman v. Taxing District of Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court· 1879-04-15· cited 17×
- City of Austin v. City of Cedar ParkTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-08-14· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Jackson v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-01-31· cited 14×
- People ex rel. Rogerson v. CrawleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1916-06-22· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.