Diaz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• matters observed by police officers were enough to establish a founded suspicion to support a stop of defendant’s vehicle
• “Two detectives . . . in an unmarked car . . . activated their blue emergency lights . . . to stop [a criminal defendant]. . . . [O]nce [they] had [done so], [the defendant] was obliged to stop. His failure to [stop] violated section 316.1935 . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Miami v. Barclay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-26· cited 7×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-03· cited 5×
• Willis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-09· cited 4×
• State v. Warshan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-28· cited 2×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-16
• Faircloth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kehoe v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 133×
• State v. Lawson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-11· cited 8×
• Brooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-10· cited 6×
• Alberty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-06· cited 4×
• State v. Contraras
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-15· cited 3×