Diaz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if the offense charged is an attempt to commit an act and the proof shows the completed act such will not defeat the conviction”
• no reversible error in failing to appoint interpreter because was ample evidence that appellant understood and communicated in the English language reasonably well

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baltierra v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 152×
• Daniel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-15· cited 65×
• Montoya v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-06-06· cited 39×
• Miller v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-10· cited 38×
• Flores v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-29· cited 35×
• Vargas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-01-20· cited 33×
• Nur v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-06-06· cited 12×
• Nguyen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-25· cited 6×
• Reginald Keith Leroy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-10
• Ladislado Munoz Gomez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-08-23
• Balderas, Juan A/K/A Apache
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-04-28
• Balderas, Juan A/K/A Apache
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-24
• Jesus Rivera Davila v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-12
• Balderas, Juan A/K/A Apache
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-11-18
• Eber Castro Morales v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2017-02-01
• Binh Hung Nguyen v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-06-01