Skip to main content

Diaz v. State

Citations

  • 743 A.2d 1166
  • 1999 Del. LEXIS 446
  • 1999 WL 1259006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that even if a witness's concern about immigration status was relevant to impeach her, the court still must \determine if the probative value of that immigration status ... is outweighed by any unfair prejudice\
  • ruling juror’s comments in open court regarding the interpretation of five testimony prejudicial
  • ‘‘all persons are qualified for jury service except those who . . . are unable to read, speak, and under- stand the English language’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • expanded voir dire ques- tioning necessary to determine English proficiency of bilingual juror
  • “When a prior out-of-court statement was originally given in another language, it is imperative that the trial judge ascertain the accuracy of that translation before the English interpretation of the statement is admitted into evidence.”
  • “In trials involving foreign language testimony and English translation when one or more jurors are bilingual, federal judges endeavor to maintain a completely impartial jury by giving special instructions to the entire jury panel prior to opening arguments and at the end of the case[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.