Skip to main content
· 8/23/2007

Diaz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Citations

  • 499 F.3d 640
  • 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1960
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20067
  • 2007 WL 2389773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the question in de novo review is not whether the plan administrator provided a full and fair hearing, but whether the plaintiff ultimately was eligible for the benefits sought under the plan
  • noting that the question in de novo review is not whether the plan administrator provided a full and fair hearing, but whether the plaintiff ultimately was eligible for the benefits sought under the plan
  • applying de novo standard of review to dis- trict court’s ERISA decision when parties cross-moved for summary judgment under Rule 56

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Chief Judge, and Bauer and Wood, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.