Skip to main content
· 5/4/2010

Diaz v. PHOENIX LUBRICATION SERVICE, INC.

Citations

  • 230 P.3d 718
  • 224 Ariz. 335
  • 581 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compiling cases that reject the notion that an alleged industry standard can be used to determine whether a duty exists
  • declining to find a duty of care where the plaintiffs “neither cite[d] nor suggest[ed] a statute that might create a duty” and the common law did not create a duty
  • deriving guidance from, but not adopting, the Third Restatement's duty framework
  • discussing duty arising from a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gemmill, Weisberg, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.