Diaz v. Kubler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Pennsylvania choice of law rules and Restatement to reject plaintiffs’ argument that one state’s law applied to nationwide claims
• rejecting four-part grouping of consumer fraud acts due to insufficient analysis, and reviewing caselaw rejecting similar groupings
• denying class certification where individual claims exceeded $100,000 because such claims “would certainly be large enough to make individual suits feasible”
• “State consumer fraud acts are designed to either protect state residents or protect consumers engaged in transactions within the state.”
• “Putative class members have a due process right to have their claims governed by state law applicable to their dispute.”
• \State consumer fraud acts are designed to either protect state residents or protect consumers engaged in transactions within the state.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).