Diaz v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Hispanic plaintiffs filed a charge of discrimination “because of their race”
• noting, at the summary judgment stage, that “evidence, statistical or otherwise, that similarly situated employees outside of the protected group systematically receive better treatment” is evidence of discrimination
• noting, at the summary judgment stage, that “evidence, statistical or otherwise, that similarly situated employees outside of the protected group systematically receive better treatment” is evidence of discrimination
• rejecting argument that \the evidence did not support an inference of discrimination because at least one [candidate within the same protected class] was not discriminated against in the same way\ as plaintiff alleged
• “the principal focus of [Title VII] is the protection of the individual employee, rather than the protection of the minority group as a whole”
• “She suggested that I plant drugs on them, or say that I caught them sleeping or violating the dress code”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).