Diaz v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding lack of inclusion where an umbrella policy was predicated on the types of vehicles the underlying insurance covered, and the underlying insurance did not apply to the vehicle at hand
• “Because the underlying insurance . . . does not apply . . . the [excess] policy also does not apply.”
• “[N]ot surprising that a document, especially one drafted by an insurance company, would use a ‘belt and suspenders’ approach ***.”
• “It is not surprising that a document, especially one drafted by an insurance company, would use a ‘belt and suspenders’ approach….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).