Skip to main content
· 6/23/2011

Diaz v. Carcamo

Citations

  • 253 P.3d 535
  • 51 Cal. 4th 1148
  • 126 Cal. Rptr. 3d 443
  • 76 Cal. Comp. Cases 637
  • 2011 Cal. LEXIS 6172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that states where the preemption rule coexists with comparative fault systems include California, Missouri, Georgia, Illinois, and Texas
  • reaffirming Armenta, 267 P.2d 303, after the adoption of comparative negligence
  • where employer admits vicarious liability for its employee’s negligent driving, plaintiff cannot pursue a negligent entrustment claim under the state’s system of allocating comparative fault
  • “No matter how negligent an employer was in entrusting a vehicle to an employee, however, it is only if the employee then drove negligently that the employer can be liable for negligent entrustment, hiring, or retention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.