Diaz-Plaza v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Blatt’s decision to follow the controlling rule of Newsom did “not amount to an independent (and entirely futile) ‘interpretation’ of that which Newsom had already definitively interpreted and handed down as the binding law of this Circuit”
• noting that Blatt’s decision to follow the controlling rule of Newsom did “not amount to an independent (and entirely futile) ‘interpretation’ of that which Newsom had already de‐ finitively interpreted and handed down as the binding law of this Circuit”
• reciting the holding of Jerman verbatim and holding that Blatt’s retroactive violation of Suesz was “wot‘the result of Blatt’s mistaken interpretation of the FDCPA”; Blatt’s “interpretation was undisputedly correct, since [Blatt] relied on Newsom to file suit exactly where Newsom allowed”
• recit‐ ing the holding of Jerman verbatim and holding that Blatt’s retroactive violation of Suesz was “not the result of Blatt’s mis‐ taken interpretation of the FDCPA”; Blatt’s “interpretation was undisputedly correct, since [Blatt] relied on Newsom to file suit exactly where Newsom allowed”
• “Blatt’s interpretation was not mistaken when it was made,”
• “Blatt’s interpretation was not mistaken when it was made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).