Diaz Paunetto Arquitectos, LLC v. Departamento De La Vivienda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that voting is a fundamental, but not absolute, right and that the interests of states in “assur[ing] that elections are operated equitably and efficiently” requires “a more flexible standard” when reviewing voting regulations
• deciding the constitutionality of a state law prohibiting tabulation of write-in votes in 1986 election
• explaining that “[e]lection laws will invariably impose some burden upon individual voters,” and are subject to a “flexible standard” of review
• noting that states \retain the power to regulate their own elections\
• upholding Hawaii’s ban on write-in voting in the primary where doing so places a minimal burden on one’s voting right and supports the state’s interest in supporting its ballot access scheme
• “recogniz[ing] that States retain the power to regulate their own elections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).