Diaz ex rel. Pena v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a plaintiff fails to present a sufficient choice of law analysis, it fails to meet is burden of proof on Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement.”
• “Classes certified under Rule 23(b)(1)(A) are generally ‘mandatory’ in nature: there is no notice requirement and class members do not have an opportunity to opt out and not be bound by the eventual judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).