Diaz Arboleda v. Arenas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 12- and 14-year-old children sufficiently objected to return where they expressed preference of staying with their mother and believed that they would have better opportunities in this country
• weighing in favor of a well-settled determination that child wants to try out for the football team when he is old enough
• denying petition where the children, ages 14 and 12, objected to returning to Columbia to live with their father because they believed they would have better educational and professional opportunities in the United States
• exception applied where children were 12 and 14 and had objected to their return during an in camera interview

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).