Diawannah Corteasher Thomas v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exemption applies to drivers of a carrier that only devoted approximately 4% of its total services to interstate commerce and distributed its inter- state assignments indiscriminately
• holding that the exemption applies to drivers of a carrier that only devoted approximately 4% of its total services to interstate commerce and distributed its inter- state assignments indiscriminately
• explaining that the overtime requirements of § 207 of the FLSA do not apply to employees who are exempt under the Motor Carrier Act
• finding that the ICC had jurisdiction over a motor carrier whose trips within interstate commerce comprised only three to four percent of its overall business
• explaining that the overtime requirements of § 207 of the FLSA do not apply to employees who are exempt under the Motor Carrier Act
• observing that, “if this were an action to recover overtime compensation for individual employees, it would be necessary to determine” “the extent to which [the employees] devoted themselves to [work affecting transportation safety]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).