Skip to main content
· 3/29/1984

Dias v. Vanek

Citations

  • 679 P.2d 133
  • 67 Haw. 114
  • 1984 Haw. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after the discharge of the jury, the only course of action to remedy an ambiguous verdict is a new trial
  • “The preferred remedy of an ambiguous verdict is to have the jurors return to clarify the verdict.”
  • “[determination of the proper amount of damages, if any, is within the exclusive province of the jury, since they are the sole judges of all disputed questions of fact”
  • “When an ambiguous or improper verdict is returned by the jury, the court should permit the jury to correct the mistake before it is discharged.”
  • the Hawaii Supreme Court quoted the ICA’s holding in Gomez that “liquidated damages may be enforced by the seller if there is a reasonable relation between the amount of payments retained and the amount of seller’s actual damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.