Diano L. Gordon v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding show-up identification was not unduly suggestive, in part, because witness observed the appellant “for several minutes in the middle of the day at a fairly close distance”
• neither the escape statute and the unauthorized absence from home detention statute are ambiguous; thus, the rule of lenity does not apply and the State is free to determine which to charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).