Dianne Harris v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• spending much of the day listening to the radio and watching TV is not substantial evidence of the ability to do full-time competitive work
• claimant shopped for food, children's school supplies, and household items; drove a car on occasion; did some cooking, ironing and laundry
• although evidence of daily activities does not, in and of itself, constitute substantial evidence, they may be considered by the ALJ
• “[D]isability is not an all-or-nothing proposition; a claimant who is not entitled to continuing benefits may well be eligible to receive benefits for a specific period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).