Skip to main content
· 6/13/1997

Diane O'Neil v. Hilton Head Hospital

Citations

  • 115 F.3d 272
  • 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1697
  • 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1579
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13904
  • 1997 WL 318069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a mutual agreement to arbitrate establishes consideration on both sides
  • explaining that “[i]f Congress had wished to exempt all employees from the coverage of the FAA it could have said so”
  • noting that as long as both an employer and employee agree to arbitrate, sufficient consideration exists to form an arbitration agreement
  • noting that as long as both an employer and employee agree to arbitrate, sufficient consideration exists to form an arbitration agreement
  • “Nothing in the [FMLA] suggests that Congress wished to exempt disputes arising under it from the coverage of the FAA.”
  • ignoring conflicting precedent in Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067-68 (4th Cir.1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Russell, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.