Diane Lovejoy-Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Noco Motor Fuel, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the loss of use of wages for a period of time is an adverse action
• holding that a suspension without pay for one week was an adverse employment action even though the employee was later reimbursed for lost wages
• holding that 21 the lost use of wages for a period, even if reimbursed, constitutes an economic injury that can qualify as a tangible employment action
• holding that a one-week suspension without pay constitutes an adverse action because the plaintiff “at least suffered the loss of the use of her wages for a time”
• finding that an employee suspension within the same month the complaint was received by the employer demonstrated a causal connection
• holding that for purposes of an ADA retaliation claim, an “adverse employment action” broadly includes “discharge, refusal to hire, refusal to promote, demotion, reduction in pay, and reprimand” (quoting Morris v. Lindau, 196 F.3d 102, 110 (2d Cir. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).