Diana Renkel v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is no private cause of action “under the Convention Against Torture because it is not self-executing”
• noting that there is no private cause of action “under the Convention Against Torture because it is not self-executing”
• “[C]ourts presume that the rights created by an international treaty belong to a state and that a private individual cannot enforce them.”
• “Issues which were raised in the district court, yet not raised on appeal, are considered abandoned and not reviewable on appeal.” (quoting Robinson v. Jones, 142 F.3d 905, 906 (6th Cir. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).