· 6/4/2025
Diana De Los Angeles Salazar v. Andre Ramon Blanco
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “identical phrases or words” is a “telltale sign[] of a canned or plagiarized affidavit”
- faulting the IJ for not relying on similarities in “narrative structure”
- faulting the IJ for relying “solely” on “non-unique” factual similarities
- “[T]he court is not limited to the particular legal theories advanced by the parties, [and] retains the independent power to identify and apply the proper construction of governing law.” (quoting Kamen v. Kemper Fin. Servs., Inc., 500 U.S. 90, 99 (1991))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.