Diana Coba, etc. v. Tricam Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the remedy [for an inconsistent verdict] is not to enter a judgment but to order a new trial so a new jury can make the necessary findings to resolve the case”
• holding “a party must timely object to any error pertaining to the verdict or the argument is waived” and that it is “well established that a failure to object to a verdict form may recover at least nominal damages”
• noting that a motion for directed verdict should be granted only if no view of the evidence could support a verdict for the nonmoving party and the trial court determines that no reasonable jury could render a verdict for the party
• noting that a motion for directed verdict should be granted only if no view of the evidence could support a verdict for the nonmoving party and the trial court determines that no reasonable jury could render a verdict for the party
• noting that a motion for directed verdict should be granted only if no view of the evidence could support a verdict for the nonmoving party and the trial court determines that no reasonable jury could render a verdict for the party
• noting inconsistent verdict exists where “two definite findings of fact material to the judgment are mutually exclusive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).