Skip to main content
· 8/30/1991

Diamond v. Union Bank and Trust of Bartlesville

Citations

  • 776 F. Supp. 542
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15618
  • 1991 WL 220569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “there is no authority, in statutory language or case law, for the proposition that a violation of the ECOA renders an instrument void”
  • admitting § 1823(e) as a defense to a claim under 12 U.S.C. § 1972

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: H. Dale Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.